-
Donone
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sat May 21, 2011 11:07 am
by Donone » Sat Sep 03, 2011 2:57 am
It has become obvious that the processing of the incoming video, builds up over a relatively short time and gets behind real life, massively.
I can see no way around this from a user perspective.
The program analyses constantly for any movement regardless of the Rules set, the Rule simply being a filter. I can see that it can be no other way unless the analysis were psychic and had foresight. However...
Suppose that the frame capture rate were 20 frames/sec, it would be useful if the user could select to only have VDV analyse, say, every 40th frame (2 secs) or be provided with a choice. The user could decide the time period dependent upon the likely events to be detected. In this way it could conceivably be set to one frame per hour. Any such 'cherry picking' would heavily reduce the overhead of processing time and disk activity, such that it could actually keep up with real life.
That would in turn permit the computer to be hibernated automatically some reasonable time after turning off a camera, as I have been attempting, rather than not managing after two hours.
I feel that there must be other users who would appreciate being able to do this.
Does anybody have any comments please before I finally decide that I have to find an alternative. I like this software, it seems unique, but too busy with no chance of reducing the business.