Search found 8 matches

wow, this would be much simpler if sighthound had IFTTT support

+1

Seems there is interest in this, as many are asking.

+1 still waiting in the dark for 3 years for this feature.

Don't want this running 100% of the time, only when i'm not home.

When it comes to something like security, i would prefer the least amount of actors in play to provide QoS. I already have the following in the mix as single point of failure (sure i'm missing some too): Cell Phone App Cell Phone Hardware Carrier / WiFi IFTTT Cloud SightHound Cloud Back End ISP Fron...

Sadly as a CompE, I gave up software at hire. I've been doing Aerospace/EE/SE for 8 years and am so far removed from the specifics of software, I would be of no use in writing useful code.

Maybe something with LabVIEW :p

Confirmed by IFTTT, 15 minutes on standard triggers (polling). Any custom made triggers fall into this category. Only "Quick Triggers" get push capability and have a lightning bolt to indicate. This is quite aggravating as this is only done to save network resources and battery life, but c...

I believe IFTTT works as push/poll based on the implementation of the software. This is a major reason why i do not like IFTTT, as the poll option has a minimum frequency of 15 minutes (if i am remembering correctly) and is quite laggy when it comes to certain action handlers. Sadly a consumer canno...

+1 for someone holding out on purchasing a license until this feature is implemented. Without some way to do geofencing, i cannot find a simple enough way to arm/disarm cameras by both myself and my girlfriend. IFTTT is very slow with their polling architecture, but at least it is a first step until...