I have a vacation property located 600 miles away from my primary residence. The property has three Amcrest 3MP cameras all located outside and mounted to the soffits. I'm currently using Amcrest's motion detection at the lowest sensitivity and threshold to detect motion but the amount of nuisance motion detection makes the system nearly useless. Leaves, shadows from tree branches swaying in the wind, insects, etc., all result in dozens (sometimes hundreds!) of daily alerts that I'm now ignoring them.
I'm really only interested in motion detection for people coming onto the property while I'm away. What should my expectations be with SightHound? I know that there's a 14 day trial but I'm generally only there for a couple for weeks at a time and evaluating multiple products means waiting between on-site visits.
I'm hoping to determine how much better SightHound might be at eliminating false positive compared to something like BlueIris which costs less the 25% of the SightHound Pro license.
Thanks -- Steve
