Search found 9 matches

...You would not believe how many of our many users are running Sighthound Video on processors which are 7+ and even 10+ years old. Visionik, Thank you very much for the comprehensive and swift response: that will hopefully not only help me to rationalize the current lack of HEVC/H.265 support. Que...

Do not want to come of too critical as this announcement is great news, but reading about DXVA and CUDA support for H.264 decoding sounds very much like a topic that was hot ~10 years ago (on FFmpeg, avsforum): I would be thrilled to hear about plans for H.265: numerous webcams sold nowadays come wi...

Its pretty clear since a while this issue is not restricted to Foscam or lost packets when using UDP. I struggle to understand why this is still recommended as a solution, while its clears the issues are due to some issues inside Sighthound/ ffmpeg. Threading issues, decoding issues or whatever when...

Hi Ryan, Many thanks for the clarification. My last comment before I stop bugging you: don't just focus on Foscam. As mentioned, mine is from Vivotek and has the same problem. And my hunch is the packets are lost insight Sighthound, perhaps a threading problem. Loosing things between threads is not ...

Understood, makes sense. According to this logic, you woulded even define this scenario twp streams? ipad and computer with sighthound accessing the same (tcp, h.264) stream at Rtsp://IP:554/live.sdp Of course the camera reports two different clients are connected. Even when this is to be consided t...

Ryan: thanks for not loosing your patience with us :) So if I may, let me ask another question...Just realized already the first post includes a picture that shows the decoding artifact is Sighthound specifc, and does not occur in the parrallel running Firefox (similar to my obervation). So why is y...

I second that. Please Ryan, consider for a moment the underlying issue to the entire thread could truely be just a Sighthound decoding issue, nothing else. No damaged streams due to nasty Foscam or UDP (well, the latter dos indead damage streams). When I read the thread, there is sufficient evidence...

Thanks for the reply Ryan. Related to UDP: nope, camara is configured to send TCP. Its really just Sighthound that cannot keepup decoding, accessing the same streams in parralell using other devices works just fine. Therefore I stick to my proposal of having Sighthound accessing different resolution...

Hi ryan, Blaming Foscam is a dead end in my view. I got a Vivotek FD8372, and I can nicly reproduce these glitches that start at the bottom of the picture by just inreasing CPU load, regardless how I do this. I could for example access a stream of 1600x1200, and I got massive glitches, but only in S...